Post by account_disabled on Jan 11, 2024 1:19:04 GMT -6
'inviolability of the right to life, liberty, equality, security and property' (art. 5, caput, CF/88). The general rule that declares ' intimacy, private life, honor and image of people are inviolable, ensuring the right to compensation for material or moral damage resulting from their violation' (art. 5, X, CF/88). The classic general rules in the sense of that 'no one will be prosecuted or sentenced except by the competent authority and that 'no one will be deprived of their liberty or their property without due legal process' (art. 5, LIII and LIV, of CF/88). All these rules and general principles, therefore, create a basic boundary for the exercise of supervisory and control functions in the employment context, making measures.
that may attack or restrict the freedom and dignity of the person working in the country openly illegal" (emphasis added). In truth, there must be priority for the human person over capital, under penalty of discouraging the human advancement of all those who worked and contributed to the efficiency of b Phone Number List usiness success. The attitude described in the present case must be vehemently restrained by the Judiciary, as following the example already set out by the MM Court of origin on p. 104 of the case, the defendant allowed her client to place the employees in a vexatious situation, all seeking to maintain a contract that was financially interesting to her. They forgot that our constitution praised the dignity of the.
human person. Therefore, there is no doubt that the use of the polygraph by the appellant appears to be illegal and by allowing this logic of the aviation market, that is, this mistaken management policy, we would be reducing the importance of Brazilian Labor Law and the normative force of its principles, restricting the worker to the condition of an object. The employer must exercise his directive power, and this exercise never authorizes him to direct the employee's life. Furthermore, even if it is admitted that the employee consented to submit to the polygraph test, this fact, in itself, does not have the power to eliminate the appellant's responsibility for paying the compensation requested in court.
that may attack or restrict the freedom and dignity of the person working in the country openly illegal" (emphasis added). In truth, there must be priority for the human person over capital, under penalty of discouraging the human advancement of all those who worked and contributed to the efficiency of b Phone Number List usiness success. The attitude described in the present case must be vehemently restrained by the Judiciary, as following the example already set out by the MM Court of origin on p. 104 of the case, the defendant allowed her client to place the employees in a vexatious situation, all seeking to maintain a contract that was financially interesting to her. They forgot that our constitution praised the dignity of the.
human person. Therefore, there is no doubt that the use of the polygraph by the appellant appears to be illegal and by allowing this logic of the aviation market, that is, this mistaken management policy, we would be reducing the importance of Brazilian Labor Law and the normative force of its principles, restricting the worker to the condition of an object. The employer must exercise his directive power, and this exercise never authorizes him to direct the employee's life. Furthermore, even if it is admitted that the employee consented to submit to the polygraph test, this fact, in itself, does not have the power to eliminate the appellant's responsibility for paying the compensation requested in court.